Relationships - Revision history

Gigermann at 22:19, 18 December 2018

2018-12-18T22:19:53Z

Gigermann at 22:19, 18 December 2018

2018-12-18T22:19:20Z

Gigermann at 20:21, 25 April 2018

2018-04-25T20:21:25Z

Gigermann at 05:56, 30 January 2017

2017-01-30T05:56:31Z

Gigermann: /* Relationship Statements */

2017-01-29T18:33:12Z

‎Relationship Statements

Gigermann: /* Using Relationships */

2017-01-29T17:11:56Z

‎Using Relationships

Gigermann: /* Using Relationships */

2017-01-29T17:11:06Z

‎Using Relationships

Gigermann: /* Challenging Relationships */

2017-01-29T17:09:48Z

‎Challenging Relationships

Gigermann: /* Challenging Relationships */

2017-01-29T17:08:55Z

‎Challenging Relationships

Gigermann: /* Using Relationships */

2017-01-29T17:08:23Z

‎Using Relationships

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 =TL;DR=
-Introduces a new, leveled Perk, "Relationship," which is, essentially, a low-level Higher Purpose, for which the bonus must be justified according to a description of the relationship (the Statement).
+Introduces a new, leveled Perk, "Relationship," which is, essentially, a low-level Higher Purpose (B59), for which the bonus must be justified according to a description of the relationship (the Statement).
 =New Leveled Perk: Relationship=

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 18 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~=Summary=~~
	The purpose of this mechanic, by focusing on specific intra-character relationships, is to encourage a properly ''cinematic'' level of role-play Drama™ to the campaign through incentives.		The purpose of this mechanic, by focusing on specific intra-character relationships, is to encourage a properly ''cinematic'' level of role-play Drama™ to the campaign through incentives.
		+
		+	=TL;DR=
		+	Introduces a new, leveled Perk, "Relationship," which is, essentially, a low-level Higher Purpose, for which the bonus must be justified according to a description of the relationship (the Statement).

	=New Leveled Perk: Relationship=		=New Leveled Perk: Relationship=

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The purpose of this mechanic, by focusing on specific intra-character relationships, is to encourage a properly ''cinematic'' level of role-play Drama™ to the campaign through incentives.
+=Summary=
-<br /><br />
+The purpose of this mechanic, by focusing on specific intra-character relationships, is to encourage a properly ''cinematic'' level of role-play Drama™ to the campaign through incentives.
 =New Leveled Perk: Relationship=

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 =Challenging Relationships=
-Relationships are not stagnant; they can radically change in an instant or gradually morph into something new. An action may be taken that is ''in conflict with'' the Relationship Statement for its subject; that Relationship has been ''challenged.'' Instead of the usual flat-rate bonus, the character is granted the use of a standard Plot Point (see associated [[rules for usage]]). After such a challenge, no further bonuses may be claimed for that Relationship for the rest of the play-session. At the end of the session, the Relationship Statement must be redefined and rewritten to reflect a new perspective (subject to GM's approval; ideally, this should be somehow related to the nature of the challenge), or the level of the Perk is reduced permanently by one.
+Relationships are not stagnant; they can radically change in an instant or gradually morph into something new. An action may be taken that is ''in conflict with'' the Relationship Statement for its subject; that Relationship has been ''challenged.'' Instead of the usual flat-rate bonus, the character is granted the use of a standard Plot Point (see [[Impulse Buys|associated rules]]). After such a challenge, no further bonuses may be claimed for that Relationship for the rest of the play-session. At the end of the session, the Relationship Statement must be redefined and rewritten to reflect a new perspective (subject to GM's approval; ideally, this should be somehow related to the nature of the challenge), or the level of the Perk is reduced permanently by one.
 <br /><br />
 '''Example:'''<br />

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Your statement for each subject you have an active Relationship with defines your opinion of that character. Your statement should be one short sentence that sums it all up. The Relationship can be positive or negative, a friendship or rivalry, independent of its strength. As you play through the campaign, your experiences and impressions of the subject will grow and change. You will be able to challenge your Relationships and alter your statement for these characters to reflect those experiences.
-=====Relationship Statement Examples=====
+'''Relationship Statement Examples:'''<br />
 *I can barely tolerate him.
 *She used to be so nice.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 =Using Relationships=
-From Higher Purpose, B59:
+''From Higher Purpose, B59:''
 <blockquote>You are driven to exceed your normal limits in one specific pursuit. You must state this exactly as if it were a Code of Honor disadvantage (p. 127): “Defend all women,” “Slay all demons,” etc. If, in the GM’s judgment, you are unfaltering in your pursuit of your Higher Purpose, you get +1 to all die rolls that pertain directly to the pursuit of your cause.</blockquote>
 Any die roll that can be justified by a given Relationship Statement is assessed a +1 bonus to that roll per level of Perk. The player must describe how the character’s Relationship drives his dramatic action, and is subject to GM's approval, as per Higher Purpose. This bonus may be claimed ''after'' a roll has been made. Only one Relationship bonus may be claimed for any one roll.

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 <br /><br />
 '''Example:'''<br />
-Hero Strongchin (the PC) requires the aid of his Ally, an old friend, for an upcoming adventure. Rather than rely on the standard flat-rate bonus, the Player decides to ''challenge'' the relationship, ''“He's too reckless,”'' by giving him some serious responsibility. By challenging the Relationship, the Player can use the bonus Plot Point to force a success on the Ally's Frequency check, and at the end of the session, the Statement is rewritten (perhaps dependent on the results of the adventure), ''“He's trying to be responsible.”'' The Player could also have elected to leave the Relationship as it is and reduce its level by one—the relationship weakens as a result.
+Hero Strongchin (the PC) requires the aid of his Ally, Slab Fistbump, an old friend, for an upcoming adventure. Rather than rely on the standard flat-rate bonus, the Player decides to ''challenge'' the relationship, ''“He's too reckless,”'' by giving Slab some serious responsibility. By challenging the Relationship, the Player can use the bonus Plot Point to force a success on the Ally's Frequency check, and at the end of the session, the Statement is rewritten (perhaps dependent on the results of the adventure), ''“He's trying to be responsible.”'' The Player could also have elected to leave the Relationship as it is and reduce its level by one—the relationship weakens as a result.
 =Improving or Changing Relationships=